Having the Liberal Label Forced Upon You

The “liberal” label applies to a lot of issues which, to me, Christians should be in favor of.

Every Democratic president gets pummeled by Republicans as “the most liberal president ever.” There is always some supposedly independent organization with a scoring system which tracks voting records on specific issues, and uses that score to determine just how liberal or conservative you are. So President Obama is being decried as the most liberal president ever, as well as the most fascist, socialist, and Islamic president ever.

But there are legitimate and often biblical reasons for Christians to hold views which Republicans blast as godless liberalism. This really vexes me. Because if you hold any views which aren’t endorsed by FoxNews and Rush, you’re labeled a heretical liberal. And I reject that label.

  • Do you stick up for the poor, like Jesus did? You’re a liberal.
  • Are you concerned about taking care of the environment? You’re a liberal.
  • Are you angered about factory farming and other cruelty to animals? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you oppose the death penalty? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you think religion should be left to parents and kept out of schools? You’re a liberal.
  • Are you against the three-strikes crime rule? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you believe there’s a place for affirmative action? Liberal.
  • Do you think unions, with their mixed bag of pros and cons, do have a legitimate role? Liberal.
  • Do you support embryonic stem cell research? Liberal.
  • Do you believe in restrictions on assault weopons? Liberal.
  • Do you oppose torturing prisoners of war? Liberal.
  • Do you think the US should keep its international agreements? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you oppose corporal punishment of children? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you feel the United Nations has a valuable role in our world? Blatant liberal.
  • Do you favor decriminalizing marijuana? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you advocate organic farming? You are such a liberal.
  • Do you think green technology is a good thing? You’re a liberal.
  • Concerned about the growing gap between the super-rich and everyone else? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you believe Wall Street should be regulated to prevent recklessness which harms our economy? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you favor net neutrality–leaving the internet as it is now, as opposed to giving internet providers broad new powers? You’re a liberal.
  • Are you against the military Don’t Ask-Don’t Tell policy? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you believe the government should fight discrimination against women and minorities? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you believe food stamps meet a legitimate need? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you believe the government should provide consumer protection regarding food, drugs, child safety, and other things? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you believe global warming is happening, and is largely caused by man? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you advocate rehabilitating prisoners, rather than just punishing them? You’re a liberal.
  • Do you believe that the government needs to raise more revenue to meet its obligations? Liberal.

I know conservative evangelicals who hold all of those views. I personally hold most of them, and in many cases, for solid biblical reasons. So I’m a liberal? A godless liberal? (As the right-wing media characterizes people who hold such views.) That just burns me up. Especially since I take so seriously how the Bible speaks to issues.

Who decided those are liberal views? Why isn’t concern for the environment a conservative cause? Or deep concern for the poor? Or consumer protection? Why do so many Christians oppose those stands? Although I prefer voting for a Republican, if it means electing someone who will oppose all of those views listed above–well, their case will need to be very compelling.

This is why I reject being either a Democrat or a Republican. Romans 12:2 says, “Do not conform to the pattern of this world.” When I take on the Democrat or Republican label and loyally adopt their approved issues and candidates, I am conforming to a pattern of this world–something not determined by  God, but by man.

I reject the way issues are pigeon-holed as either liberal or conservative. While my roots and sentiments are Republican, I totally refuse to hold views just because that is the accepted Republican view. If I believe a viewpoint is rooted in Christian values, I’m not going to believe otherwise just because Republican gurus advocate something different, no matter how they rationalize it.

No way do I want to identify as a Democrat. I do oppose a number of “liberal” issues (particularly in the pro-choice arena). And yet, I side with President Obama and Democrats on a great many issues, and for reasons in line with my faith (rather than with ideology). According to man-made definitions, that makes me a liberal. I really hate that. But if my religious convictions require that I be called a “liberal,” so be it.

Share Button

4 Comments to Having the Liberal Label Forced Upon You

  1. Steve,

    I am glad you posted this. I agree with much of what you said and will do a line by line response privately. But a couple points. I Must be a liberal, I support legalization of MJ. Not because I think it is good but because we have lost the war. Treat it like cigarettes and booze, put a tax on it (in addition to other taxes) to be used for a nationwide multimedia anti MJ program especially targeting kids.

    The reason most of us conservatives lable these positions as “Liberal” is not because of the expressed sentiment. It is because of the over-reaching nature of the practice of these goals as done by the government through unelected officials and the consistent incompetence of the government in meeting the goals coupled with the damage to the economy in general.

    I look at liberals and conservatives as women and men. Women tend to use emotion as a larger part of their thought process and men tend to avoid emotion in their thought process. So, Liberals come over as sympathetic and caring because of the words in the title of the program while conservatives say, “Let’s see how this actually works.” In most cases the results are no where near the stated goals. So, we say, let’s maybe send that back to the churches and neighborhoods where it belongs.

    Personally, w/o looking back at the list, if you remove “government” from the equation, I probably agree with the majority of the issues. Put how the government does it back into the equation and I disagree wiht the majority of the issues. The EPA, The Corps of Engineers, The UN to name a few are all bloated, power hungry organizations that need severe trimming both in personell and power. (Agenda 21 dealing with sustainability is a prime example of good ideas which are horrible in their results. Growth mismanagement acts are a direct child of this program.) We need balance and most conservatives will support some sort of government direction or involvement in many of the issues above but will not accept the current status and certainly will not accept where the Left wants to go with these issues.

  2. Tom Datema

    Don’t like labels??? But see, that gets turned around the other way too. Let’s look at your first question. “Do you stick up for the poor, like Jesus did?” Believe it or not there are at least a few people on opposite ends of the spectrum who believe that caring for the poor IS important. They just view it from different sides. Some say the government can do it best through social programming. (Liberals) Others say that government can do it best through free market economics. (Conservatives)

    Unfortunately if you say you believe that the BEST way for the government to help poor people is through free market economics nobody believes you are serious. They assume it is just a cover for being greedy and irresponsible. You can even point to the work of JJ Cowperthwaite in Hong Kong with poverty reduction or to Adam Smith’s writing to support your argument and you still get “labeled” as uncaring.

    You will get labeled no matter what you believe. The only difference seems to be how much you care about the people labeling you.

  3. As I support about half the above points, I must be a conservaberal, or maybe a liberative.

  4. Pat Werths

    Here is a problem I have. In the primary elections, I am required to choose either Republican or Democrat…should I just not vote in that election?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Receive Posts by Email

If you subscribe to my Feedburner feed, you'll automatically receive new posts by email. Very convenient.



Monthly Archives